Dan. Please tell us that you will try and educate Pam Bondi on Constitutional Rights as they relate to the 2nd Amendment.
She's supported red flag laws and raising the age for owning firearms. That screams alarm bells to anyone who understands where that can lead. Examples abound.
Can you please get her in touch with in depth education sources in protection of our gun Rights? She's got a lot on her plate and could use advisors.
May I suggest Gun Owners of America. Oregon Firearms Federation. David Codrea from AmmoLand. Washington Gun Law, Firearms Policy Coalition.
There are many more good groups but seriously, the clock is ticking for getting ahead of the anti gun groups and their dog whistle talking points that have drawn in the low information voters to destroy our Rights. Red flag laws is one of those.
State gun groups are being attacked left and right using OUR TAX dollars to fund our own demise. They want to, and are getting close to, bankrupting 2A groups just like they tried to do with DJT. Time is really running out. Lawfare against state groups is REAL. and coordinated. Judges are blatantly ignoring Supreme Court Rulings.
If the 2nd Amendment continues to fall, so goes our other Rights.
Pam Bondi is very smart. Please help her not be a stupid smart person on handling the 2nd Amendment and to see how the left uses and baits voter ignorance with boondoggle laws.
Foreign partners deal with us differently now. Having worked for a few presidents, and seeing the road show, and how we’re treated, this time is different. You’ll see some performative objections to the President’s style but, in the end, they know he’s right in his end game.
He has a discursive speaking style, and he’s a hardball negotiator with no time for niceties, but when you see him operate up close, it all makes sense. Few people in politics can close a deal like President Trump. And if the President closes on a Greenland deal, watch all the doomers pretend they were behind him the entire time.
Again, I strongly encourage debate about tactics and mechanics, but give the man a minute to action a plan before dumping all over it.
Thanks, and have a great day. 🇺🇸
You’re free to argue all day about the tactics and mechanics about how we acquire a deeper footprint in Greenland. I strongly encourage a healthy debate.
However, pretending the national security threats and problems are even remotely similar to those of the past few decades is madness.
Seeing the threats over the past year, and how they evolve DAILY, was an eye-opener. I’m not sure the “journalists” writing about the issue have the faintest idea what they’re talking about when discussing the issue. Debate all you want, but in the end, we can’t wish this problem away.
