This is a follow up to my post regarding my grandfather. Short story on his background, an Irishman at age 12 road over by himself from England after his father died 3 years earlier and his mom remarried over hear in the states. The speech I sighted was given to my oldest brother and oldest male cousin at a welcome home party for them both. My brother with a poor service record in Vietnam barley got honorable discharge and my cousin the had just finished a 5 to 7 year stretch in California penal. Even near 80 years of age didn't take shit from any even at 5'5" and 140.
Now to my point, why in the Princeton 7 case now pending and all the texts revealed about the one claiming non consent after having invite turn to univited and her inability more important than the seven involved being able in the same state of inebriation expected to make a rational decision on consent?